Halloween’s eerie vibe came early for investors in regional banks, as there were several reports of large and disturbing credit issues on October 16th—a frightful day that drove the group to a cumulative 14.3% shortfall versus the S&P 500.

The return landscape has been good for a passive “own-everything” asset allocation policy. Our hypothetical “All Asset No Authority” (AANA) portfolio has seen a few more cylinders firing this year. In fact, YTD, none of AANA’s asset class constituents have negative performance.

As AI-growth heavyweights keep pushing the S&P 500 to new all-time highs, value investors have been completely left out. Usually, buying high-quality value names is the best defense, but that has been a disaster in the current cycle. Junky value is substantially outpacing quality value.

November ushers in a tropical breeze for risk-seeking investors. The six-month stretch from November through April has proven to be an exceptionally profitable time, particularly for those exposed to factors, such as size, value, and volatility.

S&P 500 performance is being propelled by its disproportionate concentration in the Magnificent Seven stocks, while the Russell 2000’s leadership is powered by unprofitable small caps, thereby resulting in breadth of quantity, not quality.

S&P 500 Q3 estimated bottom-up operating EPS shot 5% higher with results for the first month of reporting (Chart 1). This pop is much more impressive than the 2% gain we saw in July (after the first month of reporting for Q2). The current Q3 estimate of $70.27 is about a percent better than the last reading prior to the “Liberation Day” announcement. The tariff-induced bottom-line reckoning feared this spring has yet to materialize. We’d surmise that the still L-shaped EPS snail-trail for Q4 will bounce higher, too, come January.

Read this week's MTI

The latest CPI numbers were slightly softer than consensus. The Fed had to pause its easing cycle when the CPI returned to 3% in January this year. But not this time. Our Inflation Scorecard indicates a modest disinflationary reading.

From its December 1989 inception through the end of 2022, the Dividend Aristocrats (DA) Index handily outperformed the S&P 500, posting an 11.8% annualized return compared to the parent index’s 9.7% gain. However, the AI mania driving the market today has erased much of that 33-year advantage, and Dividend Aristocrats rank as the worst performing style since the beginning of 2023. We were intrigued by this turnabout and what it means for investing in dividend growers going forward.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Interest-rate cycles driven by Fed-policy changes can be the most powerful determinants of economic and market conditions. Decisions to raise or lower the fed funds rate impact sectors and styles differently; September’s rate cut prompted us to review equity winners and losers from prior episodes.

While our traditional breadth and leadership studies advise the market is quite healthy, we’ve lately observed some broader disagreement from long-term leaders, including the Magnificent Seven—of which only two have made new 52-week highs over the last month.

Officially, as of September 30th, five of our eight bellwethers have confirmed the latest S&P 500 high. That’s typically good enough for the boat to stay afloat—and looks healthier than at February’s high.

The stock rally and associated wealth effect make an imminent recession less likely (data that corroborates our Up/Down Earnings figures). Yet, things can change quickly when so much is riding on the market. Employment is still the biggest threat.

While the U.S. is the center of attention for global investors, Chinese stocks have quietly outperformed. At first glance, it might be tempting to give credit to the surge in Chinese Tech names. In reality, the upswing is much broader and began long before the Alibaba rally.

In contrast to its solid showing through the mega-cap-growth boom of recent years, Quality was a Q3 outlier, trailing SPX by over 5%. Part of the cause is sector allocation, as defensive stocks are badly out of favor. The other force was stock selection—for example, the absence of NVDA.

Read this week's Major Trend. 

Levered ETFs have been on the scene for almost 20 years, but their popularity has exploded during the post-pandemic bull market led by the tech titans that dominate the Artificial Intelligence evolution.  Two characteristics of levered ETFs suggest to us that this asset class could possibly be a useful barometer of investor sentiment.  First, their exaggerated payouts mean that investors will win big when they are right and lose big when they are wrong, implying a high degree of confidence in their outlook.  Second, with their effectiveness measured in days, these instruments are best used to reflect an outlook that will come to pass in a fairly short time.  These two properties are suggestive of a particular mindset, and our study considers this signaling potential from a number of angles.

Read this week's Major Trend.